Coordinate Validation Decision Tree

Should you proceed with calculation? Or do you need to stop and verify? Use this logic flow to make safe decisions about your geospatial data.

How to Use

Start at the top block. Verify each condition. If you hit a 'STOP' condition, fix the data before proceeding.

Online Tool

START: Receive Data
Has EPSG Code / CRS Metadata?
NO →
YES ↓
STOP: Ambiguous Data
Ask provider for source datum.
Is Operation "Calculation"?
(Distance, Area, Buffer)
YES ↓
Is CRS Projected & Preserving?
(UTM, State Plane, Albers)
NO (Lat/Lon or Web Mercator) →
YES ↓
STOP: Projection Error Risk
Reproject to UTM/Local before calc.
PROCEED S AFELY

Use Cases

FAQ

Q: What is the 'Ambiguity Trap'?

A: It's when coordinates lack metadata (EPSG). You assume WGS84, but it was actually NAD27. The flowchart forces you to stop if metadata is missing.

Q: Why stop for epoch differences?

A: For high-precision work (cm-level), different time epochs mean different physical positions due to tectonic plate movement.

Q: Can I automate this flow?

A: Yes! This logic is ideal for building automated Python/ETL scripts for data ingestion pipelines.

Professional Verification Disclaimer

This content is provided for decision-support and educational purposes for geospatial professionals and does not constitute legal, surveying, or engineering advice. Regulations and official standards vary by jurisdiction and project scope. Information is based on publicly available standards as of January 11, 2026. For critical projects, always verify current requirements with:

Reference: Professional Use & Scope

Related Coordinate Conversion Tools