方眼北 vs 真北 vs 磁北

Three different "norths" are used in mapping and navigation: True North, Magnetic North, and Grid North. Confusing them is one of the most common sources of angular error in engineering surveys, military navigation, and directional drilling. Each has a distinct definition and a specific professional use case.

One-line summary: True North = Earth's geographic pole. Magnetic North = where your compass points. Grid North = north on a UTM or State Plane map grid.

真北(地理的北)

True North points toward the geographic North Pole, the point where Earth's rotational axis meets the surface. All meridians of longitude converge at True North. It is fixed relative to the Earth's surface and is the reference for latitude/longitude and all geodetic measurements.

磁北

Magnetic North is where a compass needle points, toward the magnetic pole in the Arctic. It does not coincide with True North and changes over time (secular variation). The angular difference between Magnetic North and True North is called magnetic declination.

グリッド北

Grid North points toward the top of a map grid (e.g., a UTM or State Plane grid). Because these grids are flat projections of a curved Earth, they cannot be perfectly aligned with True North everywhere. The angular difference between Grid North and True North is called meridian convergence (or grid convergence).

子午線収束角の重要性

Meridian convergence is the angle between Grid North and True North at a specific location. It is calculated as:

γ = (λ - λ₀) ±sin(φ)

Where λ is longitude, λ₀ is the central meridian, and ρEis latitude. At high latitudes (e.g., Alaska, Scandinavia), convergence grows larger and causes serious errors if ignored.

Real Case —$2M Directional Drilling Failure: In a North Sea offshore drilling project, unaccounted meridian convergence between Grid North (used in the drill plan) and True North (used in the wellbore survey) caused a systematic angular error in bottom-hole position. The wellbore deviated far enough to create anti-collision risk with adjacent wells, requiring emergency sidetracking at a cost of $2 million.
—Read Full Case Study

実用変換テーブル

ApplicationUse This "North"Notes
Compass navigationMagnetic NorthApply declination correction for true bearing
GPS / coordinate systemsTrue NorthAll lat/long bearings are relative to True North
UTM / State Plane surveysGrid NorthApply convergence correction for True North
Directional drillingTrue NorthISCWSA standards require convergence correction
Military MGRSGrid NorthMGRS is based on the UTM grid
Legal property descriptionsTrue NorthMetes and bounds use true bearings

グリッド北→真北変換の計算方法

  1. Determine your UTM zone and central meridian (e.g., Zone 17N: 81W)
  2. Calculate the longitude difference: Δλ = your longitude - central meridian
  3. Apply: γ = Δλ ±sin(φ) [in degrees, where ρE= latitude]
  4. Positive γ = Grid North is east of True North

Convert coordinates between UTM and Lat/Long, tool includes zone information:

—Lat/Long to UTM Converter

FAQ

Does Google Maps use Grid North or True North?

Google Maps displays a north-up orientation that approximates True North at the center of the map. Because the underlying Web Mercator (EPSG:3857, valid -85.05° to +85.05°) projection aligns grid lines with True North at the equator, grid north and true north diverge at higher latitudes.

How large can meridian convergence get?

In UTM, convergence can reach ±3 at zone edges at moderate latitudes. At high latitudes (Alaska, Arctic regions), it can exceed 5. In State Plane coordinates, it is typically smaller because zones are narrower.

Do I need to apply convergence correction for GIS work?

For GIS work using angular measurements (bearings, azimuths), yes. For plotting coordinates only, convergence is already accounted for in the projection math. The issue arises when mixing angular measurements from field instruments (referenced to Magnetic or True North) with grid-based coordinate systems.

What is the magnetic declination in the US?

US magnetic declination ranges from about -20 in the Pacific Northwest to +15 in Maine and the Northeast. The agonic line (zero declination) runs roughly through the eastern Midwest. Always check the NOAA NCEI Geomagnetic Calculator for current, location-specific values.

See also: Coordinate Reference Standards | 測量における縮尺係数 (Scale Factor) | UTM Anti-Collision Failure Case

米国平面直角座標系(SPCS)変換 & ガイド

各州固有の正角投影グリッドからGPS WGS84への高精度測量・工学座標変換。

測地技術リファレンス
公的測地パラメータ・技術文献に基づく解説

地殻変動と再施工リスク:NAD83 vs WGS84の累積誤差

北米プレートは年間約2cm移動するため、NAD83(2011)とWGS84(G1762)は現在2.2メートル以上乖離しています。 高精度なNAD83地籍杭打ちに「標準的な」GPS WGS84座標を使用したことで、基礎のやり直しやインフラの配置ミスによる5万ドルの専門家責任賠償請求が発生しています。

リスク指標: 2.2mの地殻変動とエポック累積ズレ