Easily calculate the precise distance and bearing (direction) between two locations. Just paste your GPS coordinates (latitude and longitude) below.

Point A (Start)

Point B (End)

Calculation Results

Distance (Kilometers)
--
Distance (Miles)
--
Initial Bearing (True North)
--
Spherical Distance (Haversine)
--
Point A Point B

Geodetic-Grade vs. Spherical Distance

Calculating distance on an oblate spheroid (Earth) requires solving the geodetic inverse problem. While a "Spherical Earth" model (Haversine) is sufficient for simple navigation or logistics, precision engineering and land surveying demand Vincenty's formulae, which accounts for the Earth's flattening at the poles.

Geodetic Accuracy: Spheroidal vs. Spherical Distortions

Using spherical distance models (such as Haversine) over long baselines neglects the Earth's polar flattening (f ≈ 1/298.257). For infrastructure corridors and geodetic control, this introduces systematic errors of up to 0.5% (~5 meters per kilometer), leading to cumulative traverse misclosure and boundary discrepancies:

Baseline LengthTypical Spherical ErrorRecommended Computation Model
Local (< 10 km)< 5 metersHaversine or Projected Grid (SPCS/UTM)
Regional (10 – 500 km)50 – 2,500 metersVincenty Inverse on WGS84 / GRS80
Continental (> 1,000 km)Up to 5,000+ metersGeodesic Inverse (Vincenty or Karney geodesic)

Vincenty's Formula Accuracy

The Vincenty inverse formula used in this tool provides an accuracy of up to 0.5mm (0.0005m) on the WGS84 ellipsoid. It involves an iterative process that converges on the shortest distance (geodesic) between two points.

  • Initial Azimuth: The True North bearing measured at the start point (A) towards the end point (B).
  • Flattening (f): 1/298.257223563 (WGS84 Standard).
  • Convergence: Our engine performs 100 iterations to ensure coordinate stability for global benchmarks.
Geodetic Engineering Note
Referenced to published geodetic benchmarks

The Cumulative Boundary & Engineering Rework Exposure: NAD83 vs WGS84

Because the North American Plate moves ~2cm/year, NAD83(2011) and WGS84(G1762) currently diverge by over 2.2 meters. Using a "standard" GPS WGS84 coordinate for a high-precision NAD83 cadastral staking has triggered Boundary Dispute Geodetic Offset claims for foundational rework and utility misplacement.

Risk Exposure Metric: 2.2-Meter Tectonic Drift & Epoch Accumulation